Sexism in Scientific and Pseudo-Scientific Explanations of Sex Inequality: An Empirical, Ethical and Educative Approach.

Grant number: FT110100658 | Funding period: 2012 - 2016

Completed

Abstract

Neuroscientific explanations of sex inequality are scientifically premature, and lead to popular exaggerations that sustain inequality through self-fulfilling effects. This project will increase understanding of these harmful consequences, and bring about essential improvements in both the quality of scientific research, and public understanding.

Related publications (5)

Beyond Mars and Venus: The role of gender essentialism in support for gender inequality and backlash

L Skewes, C Fine, N Haslam

2018-07-01

It has been argued that gender essentialism impedes progress towards greater gender equality. Here we present a new gender essenti..

“Why Does all the Girls have to Buy Pink Stuff?” The Ethics and Science of the Gendered Toy Marketing Debate

C Fine, E Rush

2018-06-01

The gendered marketing of children’s toys is under considerable scrutiny, as reflected by numerous consumer-led campaigns and vigo..

Testosterone Rex: Myths of sex, science, and society

C FINE

2017-01-27

Expanding the Role of Gender Essentialism in the Single-Sex Education Debate: A Commentary on Liben

C Fine, R Duke

2015-05-24

In this commentary we expand on Liben’s exploration of the effects of differing gender conceptualizations – gender essentialism an..

Recommendations for sex/gender neuroimaging research: Key principles and implications for research design, analysis, and interpretation

G Rippon, R Jordan-Young, A Kaiser, C Fine

2014-08-28

Neuroimaging (NI) technologies are having increasing impact in the study of complex cognitive and social processes. In this emergi..

University of Melbourne Researchers

Cordelia Fine